Micronational reactions to the 2019 Hong Kong protests

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Micronational opinions
of macronational events

United Kingdom
EU elections2019
General elections2019
Royal deathsPhilip, Duke of Edinburgh
Elizabeth II

United States of America
Presidential elections2016
Gubernatorial electionsCalifornia recall, 2021

Federal elections2019


Annexation of Crimea2014
Catalonian Independence2017
Chinese Uyghur internment2017‑ongoing
Hong Kong protests2019
George Floyd protests2020
Belarusian Protests2020
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict2020
US Capitol Protests2021
Cuban Protests2021
Fall of Kabul2021
Kazakhstan Protests2022
Russo-Ukrainian war2022
Brasilia attacks2023
Gaza−Israel conflict2023

This is a list of the following micronations / micronationalists' public reactions to the 2019 Hong Kong extradition protests, expressing support to the protesters or the Government of Hong Kong.


Support for the Government of Hong Kong

  •  Paloma - The State sees the People's Republic of China as the legitimate force of Hong Kong and Macau. The president of Paloma calls this uprising a "daring attempt at a miny coup" which he says is because the Chinese government will just repeat the Tiananmen square massacre but possibly on a larger scale.
  • Socialist Republic Of Atlantica - The Republic believes that the PRC is the legitimate owner of Hong Kong, and that the British stole Hong Kong from the Qing Dynasty.

Support for the protesters

  •  Grand Republic of Cycoldia - The Grand Republic of Cycoldia states that Hong Kong should be given to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as well the Grand Republic of Cycoldia recognises Taiwan (Republic of China) as the legitimate government of China, and the PRC as a pretender government.
  •  Commonwealth of Essexia - Essexia supports the Hong Kong protesters against the rule of China. This is as the position of the Emperor, along with opposition parties, is to fully support their fight for democracy whether that future is in China or not. However, the official party position of the ruling party in Essexia is neutrality on macronational events
  • Founder Swena, but not on behalf of Theodia. Support has taken the form of numerous small comments on social media.
  •  Principality of Caudonia supports the Hong Kong protesters against the rule of China.
  • United Royal Republics of Jockromasa - The Royal Republics of Jockromasa fully support the Hong-Kong protests and even believes that Hong-Kong should be a free nation.
  • Prime Minister Ewing of Fishing Trail "Let Hong Kong be."
  •  Suverska - Suverska established their support for the protestors.
  •  Georgienstine Raphaël Olivier I, President of Georgienstine announced his support for the protesters but he urged them not to use violent tactics.
  • The Templar Kingdom fully supports Hong Kong's right for self-determination. This was promised under the return of Hong Kong by the UK to China. Anything less is treason.
  • The Kingdom of Hilltop is staunchly anti-communist and supports the return of Hong Kong to Britain.
  • The Autonomous City of New Victoria has stated it's support for Pro-Democracy Protests. It supports Hong Kong self-determination and the democracy promised after the handover. It has called the laws passed by the Government of Hong Kong "tyrannical, undemocratic and against freedom."


  • Leon Montan believes that the extradition bill was justified as it ends murderers being able to go free due to a legal loophole, but Hong Kong should be more autonomous, if not independent.
  • Xindapist People's Commonwealth beleves that hong kong was stolen by the uk but prc is wrong

See also